Is Intel Celeron Better Than Pentium

Intel Celeron N4000 vs N4100 vs N4120: What'due south the difference?

(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Celeron (opens in new tab) CPUs have been role and parcel of Intel's processor family for more than two decades. They've played a vital part in the company'south production mix, despite not getting the sort of press coverage equally its flagship CPU family, the Core serial.

That's partly due to the fact you can't really purchase most Celeron models today.

A fair chunk are either sold every bit part of a motherboard (e.1000. this Seeed motherboard (opens in new tab)) or as part of a complete system - most likely a tablet (opens in new tab) or a laptop.

We've built a listing of the all-time mobile workstations (opens in new tab) on the market
Check out our list of the best business computers (opens in new tab) right now
Hither'due south our list of the all-time workstations (opens in new tab) available

Intel Celeron N4000 vs Celeron N4100

The N4000 is arguably one of the almost sought subsequently Intel processors. It was launched alongside the N4100 towards the end of 2017, most three years ago. Both are Gemini Lake parts and built on a 14nm manufacturing process.

That's not where the similarities end; they have a base speed of i.1GHz, 4MB cache, a TDP of 6W, back up up to 8GB of DDR4/LPDDR4 retention in dual channel manner, run an Intel UHD graphics subsystem with a base of operations frequency of 200MHz and can drive upwards to three 4K displays.

The biggest difference is in the number of cores. The N4000 has two cores and ii threads, while the N4100 has four cores and four threads. The latter as well has a slightly lower boost frequency (2.4GHz vs ii.6GHz) and a slightly higher graphics burst frequency (700MHz vs 650MHz).

What this means is that the Celeron N4000 ends upwardly being significantly slower than the N4100, non so much on single thread performance only more because it has half the number of physical cores.

Passmark numbers testify that information technology is nearly twoscore% slower than the N4100. Fifty-fifty worse, is information technology hardly even competes with older processors, such as the Celeron N3450.

What about the Celeron N4120?

Although the N4120 was launched towards the stop of last twelvemonth, it bears a potent resemblance to its predecessors. Based on the Gemini Lake refresh, it shares many common qualities with the N4100, except for a slightly college boost frequency (2.6GHz vs ii.5GHz).

That should, in theory, give it a slim advantage when benchmarked. However, this hasn't been demonstrated but yet, partly because information technology's a new processor and non many systems have been tested with this CPU at the captain.

In conclusion, information technology's best to avoid computers, tablets and laptops based on the N4000 and opt for those with either the N4100 or the N4120. These two are within touching distance of a seventh generation Intel Core i3 processor, which is to say they are quite nippy indeed when paired with an SSD and plenty of retentivity.

Hither'southward our list of the all-time business laptops (opens in new tab) out there

Désiré has been musing and writing about technology during a career spanning four decades. He dabbled in website builders and web hosting when DHTML and frames were in faddy and started narrating nigh the impact of engineering science on society just earlier the start of the Y2K hysteria at the turn of the last millennium.